KEY TOPIC TABLE FOR STATE CIVIL SERVICE APPEALS DECISIONS BY WERC SINCE 2003
Case Name |
Case Number |
Date Issued |
Decision Number |
Description |
Kraniak v. Dube et al. (Dane County Circuit Court) |
03CV000668, 03CV000884 |
11/7/2003 |
0 |
procedure, petition for rehearing, granting of a petition for rehearing suspends what would otherwise have been a final order. |
Bell-Marek v. DHFS & DER |
62900 |
12/5/2003 |
30748 |
merits, classification, Programming and Planning Analyst 5 & 6, factor evaluation system |
Scott v. DOC & DER |
62887 |
1/15/2004 |
30767 |
MSJ, classification, Maintenance Mechanic 3 to HVAC Specialist, "typically 90% or more" |
Chiapetta v. DER |
63027 |
1/15/2004 |
30760 |
merits, classification, Financial Specialist 4 to 5, policy of 25% minimum change in duties, comparison position misclassified |
Goins v. DOC |
62931 |
1/16/2004 |
30766 |
jurisdition, probationary employee, effect of bargaining agreement |
Forrest-DeSmith v. UW & DER |
62885 |
1/16/2004 |
30769 |
merits, effective date of classification action, application of policy bulletin CLR/POL-57 |
Allen v. DER |
62777 |
1/29/2004 |
30772 |
jurisdiction, market stratification pay increase upon reallocation, rewriting class specifications |
Del Frate v. DOC |
62764 |
2/27/2004 |
30795 |
merits, discipline, suspension, arranging for inmate to make table for personal use of another employee |
Kline v. UW & OSER |
63202 |
3/2/2004 |
30818 |
timeliness, burden on appellant, non-selection, classification |
Eidenshink v. DER |
62776 |
3/2/2004 |
30819 |
jurisdiction, placement of incumbent at certain pay point on schedule upon reallocation |
Sears v. UW |
62759 |
3/3/2004 |
30794 |
jurisdiction, layoff from classified position and related actions of elimination of unclassified position, creation of new unclassified position and restoration from unclassified to classified position |
Allen v. DER |
62777 |
3/22/2004 |
30772-A |
timeliness of petition for rehearing |
Gustavus v. DOC |
62919 |
3/24/2004 |
30817 |
jurisdiction, decision to deny request to work no more than an 8.5 hour workday for 2 weeks |
Kraniak v. DHFS |
62882 |
3/30/2004 |
30860 |
EAJA, discharge case, due process failure but analysis of substantive discharge decision |
Fredrick v. DPI & DER |
62338 |
4/14/2004 |
30879 |
merits, reclass, Education Program Specialist to Education Consultant Coordinator, team leader vs. leadworker, logical and gradual change |
Sabez v. UW & DMRS |
62782 |
4/30/2004 |
30890 |
timeliness, effect of filing grievance |
Dennis v. DMRS |
62788 |
4/30/2004 |
30892 |
jurisdiction, exam, vacancy for administrator of DMRS |
Beck v. DOC (issued by Examiner KMS) |
62784 |
5/5/2004 |
30877-A |
jurisdiction, issue for hearing, career executive reassignment for reasons of discipline vs. demotion, standard is "reasonable and proper" |
Elmer v. UW |
62813 |
5/18/2004 |
30910 |
timeliness, effective date of non-selection, effect of final day falling on holiday, reasonable conduct does not satisfy time requirement |
Stern v. DWD |
63312 |
6/1/2004 |
30912 |
jurisdiction, (probationary) termination alleged to have occurred after probation had been completed but, if so, position is within bargaining unit. Modified on appeal, 296 Wis. 2d 306, 722 N.W.2d 594, 2006 WI App 193 |
Sutheimer v. DOA |
62920 |
6/22/2004 |
30932-A |
MSJ, definition of layoff, definition of transfer (involuntary), constructive demotion, record insufficient to determine proper class of position after alleged demotion |
Kohl v. OSER & DATCP |
62902 |
7/23/2004 |
30996 |
merits, classification, initial allocation, career executive program, supervisor, confidential, management, factor evaluation system, Program and Planning Analyst & PPA Advanced Management |
Fredrick v. DPI & DER |
62338 |
7/26/2004 |
30879-A |
EAJA, classification case, request denied |
Hortman v. DOC |
63534 |
8/11/2004 |
31037 |
jurisdiction, initial probationary termination |
Zeidel v. UW |
63513 |
8/11/2004 |
31038 |
jurisdiction, non-selection, academic staff position (unclassified service) |
Bertotto v. DOC (issued by examiner LAM) |
62876 |
8/16/2004 |
31043-A |
procedure, motion to hold case in abeyance pending outcome of discrimination complaint |
Rice v. OSER |
63104 |
10/1/2004 |
31093 |
merits, classification, Program Asst. 4, Engineering Tech-Trans, Engineering Spec-Trans |
Roh v. OSER |
62786 |
10/1/2004 |
30951-A |
merits, classification, Employment and Training Specialist, ETS-Lead, reallocation based on duties at effective date, leadwork, primary purpose |
Krueger v. UW |
63879 |
10/6/2004 |
31104 |
jurisdiction, probationary term (allegation of SELRA violation) |
Kraniak v. DHFS |
62882 |
10/11/2004 |
30860-B |
1) procedure, rehearing; 2) discipline, pretermination due process a) explanation of evidence b) decision-maker relied upon investigation conducted by subordinates c) alleged destruction of evidence; 3) alleged illegal surveillance |
Winchester v. UW & OSER |
62767 |
10/21/2004 |
31065-A |
1) merits, reallocation, Offset Press Operator and OPO Lead, leadwork, 2) jurisdiction a) change in rate of pay upon reallocation, b) promotion vs. reallocation |
Rasmussen v. DOC |
63702 |
10/22/2004 |
31121 |
timeliness, incorrect zipcode on appeal, affidavit from respondent regarding date of receipt of letter of discipline |
Roh v. OSER |
62786 |
11/17/2004 |
30951-B |
final order adopting interim order and dismissing case |
Gawenda v. UW |
63742 |
11/18/2004 |
31149 |
jurisdiction, non-selection, academic staff position |
Goggin v. DOT |
62918 |
11/23/2004 |
31153 |
jurisdiction, 230.44(1)(d), action (referred to in personnel records as "reinstatement" and described in motion as "reassignment") involved selecting 1 of 5 existing employees for radical change in duties to cause reallocation to a different class/cbu |
Federlin v. DOC |
63077 |
11/24/2004 |
31094-A |
merits, discipline, demotion, failure to timely perform assigned duties (financial and recordkeeping), unauthorized possession of documents |
Zeiler v. DOC |
63239 |
12/7/2004 |
31107-A |
merits, non-selection, effect of drug conviction record on hiring decision for position inside prison with significant inmate contact |
Burzynski v. DNR & OSER |
62752 |
1/6/2005 |
31125 |
merits, classification, Programming and Planning Analyst 4 & 5, Factor Evaluation System, roles as project leader or team leader over LTEs vs. permanent employees, role of comparable FES case |
Bedynek-Stumm v. DHFS |
62941 |
1/11/2005 |
31099-A |
jurisdiction, non-selection, limited term position (LTE) |
Gruen v. DHFS |
63079 |
1/19/2005 |
31154 |
merits, discipline, suspension, scope of review as to prior reprimand, due process as to parts of investigation, alteration of work schedule without prior authorization, insubordination |
Her v. DPI |
63741 |
1/28/2005 |
31170 |
timeliness, notification of non-selection decision occurs on receipt rather than on mailing, non-delivery of notification letter |
Robinson v. UW |
64797 |
2/18/2005 |
30989-A |
merits, discipline, supervisor's sexual activity with a co-worker in assigned office, excessiveness |
Grohmann v. OJA |
62930 |
3/11/2005 |
31021 |
merits, discipline; comments, touching and physical positioning by male supervisor that causes discomfort for female co-workers; insubordination, discourtesy, sex harassment; evidence, hearsay, investigator's report, letter from non-party's attorney |
Metnik v. DOC & OSER |
62914 |
3/18/2005 |
31135 |
merits, classification, Program Assistant 2 & 4, paraprofessional, level of supervision, effect of initial class analyst's failure to provide rationale, compensatory damage request |
Gittens v. WSTCB |
64091 |
3/18/2005 |
31278 |
jurisdiction, non-selection, unclassified position |
Schmidt v. DOC & OSER |
62915 |
3/18/2005 |
31134 |
merits, classification, Program Assistant 2 & 4, paraprofessional, level of supervision, assumed time percentages for worker activities, effect of initial class analyst's failure to provide rationale |
Ryskoski v. DHFS |
63006 |
3/24/2005 |
31191 |
merits, discipline, discharge, inappropriate statements over a two-year period to staff about patients and other staff that were sexually and racially derogatory, violated previous oral directive |
Robinson v. UW |
63797 |
4/18/2005 |
30989-B |
EAJA, prevailing party solely as to level of discipline which had been reduced from discharge to demotion |
Steinke v. DNR & OSER [affirmed on judicial review |
62753 |
5/12/2005 |
31103-A |
merits, classification, Fisheries Technician and Fisheries Technician-Advanced, focus on one of several buildings at hatchery rather than entire facility, paraprofessional, effective date where prior appeal from survey |
Grohmann v. OJA |
62930 |
5/16/2005 |
31021-A |
EAJA, analysis of respondent's position in the administrative proceeding as well as the underlying disciplinary action |
Struensee v. UW |
64702 |
6/2/2005 |
31348 |
jurisdiction, probationary termination |
Stuchlik v. DOC |
64621 |
6/6/2005 |
31353 |
jurisdiction, probationary termination |
Gerritson v. DOC |
62749 |
6/14/2005 |
31234-A |
merits, discipline, demotion, personal relationship between prison shift commander (the appellant, who had twice denied the existence of a relationship) and subordinate sergeant with numerous suggestive e-mails exchanged |
Elmer v. DATCP |
63486 |
6/29/2005 |
31317-A |
merits, non-selection, interviewer recusal, no showing of bias, non-uniform number of panelists, incomplete interview notes, role of exam score, rational basis for selection decision |
Fullerton v. DOC |
62921 |
7/1/2005 |
31308 |
merits, layoff, displacement in lieu of layoff, ER-MRS 22.08, same or counterpart payrange, effect of changes in classification and pay range assignments for position after appellant left the position in question |
Biggar v. DOC |
64706 |
7/11/2005 |
31388 |
timeliness, 30 day limit is mandatory rather than discretionary, relates to competency to proceed rather than a jurisdictional requirement, incorrectly addressed envelope |
Norris-Dunn v. DNR & OSER |
62750 |
7/11/2005 |
31298 |
merits, classification, Program Assistant 1 to 2, duties acquired after effective date, volume of work |
Carter v. UW |
63843 |
7/19/2005 |
31403 |
procedure, failure to appear at hearing by party with burden of proof, dismissal for failure to prosecute |
Steinke v.DNR & OSER [affirmed on judicial review] |
62753 |
7/29/2005 |
31103-B |
findings of fact and conclusions of law upon petition for judicial review of WERC's decision on merits in classification case |
Bedynek-Stumm v. BOALTC |
62940 |
8/10/2005 |
31295 |
1) jurisdiction, non-selection, allegations of Fair Employment Act discrimination and violation of Older Americans Act; 2) merits, non-selection, veterans preference points, adequacy of notes [also see 31295-A] |
Bedynek-Stumm v. DWD |
62942 |
8/10/2005 |
31332-A |
procedure, 1) request to recuse; 2) lack of prosecution; standard, failure to appear at conferences |
Eslinger v. DOC & DHFS |
64029 |
9/10/2005 |
31416 |
jurisdiction, reduction in rate of compensation and action to recoup previously paid amounts, effect of 111.93(3) |
Bedynek-Stumm v. BOALTC |
62940 |
9/23/2005 |
31295-A |
merits, non-selection, overqualified, ruling on petition for rehearing |
C. J. v. DOC |
64827 |
10/24/2005 |
31491 |
jurisdiction, initial rate of pay upon appointment vs. discretionary market adjustment |
Solin v. DNR & OSER |
63608 |
11/4/2005 |
31424 |
1) merits, classification, Natural Resources Law Enforcement Supervisor and Natural Resources Program Manager, effective date; 2) jurisdiction, rate of pay, restriction on number of overtime hours |
Warren v. DHFS & DMRS |
63110 |
12/22/2005 |
31215-A |
1) merits, transfer, eligibility, customary orientation; 2) procedure, evidence, official notice; 3) jurisdiction, constructive demotion, movement between classifications in counterpart pay ranges, applying rule definitions |
Williams v. DOR |
65091 |
12/29/2005 |
31566 |
timeliness, rescission of employment offer, equitable estoppel |
Kohl v. DATCP & OSER |
62902 |
1/5/2006 |
30996-A |
MSJ, remedy phase |
Kohl v. DATCP |
65094 |
1/5/2006 |
31569 |
timeliness |
Steinke v. DNR, WERC & OSER |
05CV408 |
1/6/2006 |
Sheboygan County Circuit Court affirmed WERC decisions 31103-A and B, issued 5/12/2005 and 7/29/2005 |
|
Huntley v. DOT |
63557 |
2/2/2006 |
31459 |
merits, discipline, 10-day suspension, alleged ethical violations, failure to notify A of ethics policy changes, A obtained approval in advance for other conduct |
Zenchenko v. DNR & OSER |
64791 |
2/21/2006 |
31614 |
timeliness, classification, notice of survey result, verbal vs. written notice, blind appellant, document delivered in 2005 was first written notice of 1997 reallocation |
Fassbender v. DOC |
64196 |
2/23/2006 |
31270-A |
merits, discipline, use of state vehicle for personal travel, written rep in lieu of 3-day susp reduced to written rep, physical contact with inmate to demonstrate their behaviors, 5-day susp reduced to written rep in lieu of 1-day |
deMoya v. DVA |
65270 |
3/7/2006 |
31636 |
jurisdiction, temporary assignment of career executive to special project |
deMoya v. DVA |
65324 |
3/7/2006 |
31637 |
jurisdiction, relocating and downsizing A's office |
Solin v. DNR & OSER |
63608 |
3/7/2006 |
31424-A |
EAJA, failure to establish that gross income satisfied eligibility requirement |
Bartz-Bentz v. DVA |
64123 |
4/12/2006 |
31485 |
[modified and reissued as 31485-B] |
Kohl v. DATCP & OSER |
62902 |
4/12/2006 |
30996-B |
EAJA, classification case, decision was contrary to longstanding precedent, no basis to exceed $150 statutory rate, electronic research costs, apportionment of costs when only partial success |
Toman v. DHFS |
65533 |
5/3/2006 |
31676 |
timeliness, action of maintaining a termination letter (rather than a resignation letter) as part of appellant's personnel file |
Fassbender v. DOC |
65409 |
5/3/2006 |
31677 |
timeliness, fax reached Commission after close of business, e-mail to WERC staff located outside Madison |
Weber v. DOCommerce & OSER |
62884 |
6/8/2006 |
31576 |
1) issue and claim preclusion; 2) merits, reclass, Community Services Specialist 2 and 3, Economic Development Consultant, disputed duties |
Knutson v. DOJ & OSER |
64030 |
6/22/2006 |
31155-A |
merits, reclass, Program Assistant 2 and 3, majority of duties, de novo review rather than consideration of procedure followed, work performed for 6 months prior to effective date and permanently assigned |
Somerville v. DOT |
64631 |
6/27/2006 |
31685 |
timeliness, reclass appeal, equitable estoppel, supervisor placed copy of denial on employee desk and said no need to worry about process for review until they conversed, no express mention of filing period |
Thiel v. DOT et al. |
64379, 65169 |
6/27/2006 |
31725 31726 |
1) jurisdiction, request to dismiss parties, effect of no formal answer, assignment of duties, no identified action taken by DMRS or OSER, no allegation of misclassification; 2) timeliness, inclusion on cert list |
Gerritson v. DOC |
62749 |
7/31/2006 |
31234-B |
remedy, demotion reduced to 20-day suspension, burden of proof; failure to mitigate, effect of second and non-disciplinary demotion; unconditional offer of reinstatement, same or subst equiv position; EAJA |
Treleven v. DOC & OSER |
65120 |
8/8/2006 |
31754 |
jurisdiction, pay after reallocation and reinstatement rather than regrade, member of bargaining unit, effect of 111.93(3) |
Bartz-Bentz v. DVA |
64123 |
8/9/2006 |
31485-B |
merits, discipline, discharge, multiple allegations but only some pursued, occupational therapy supervisor, misappropriating or failing to use state equipment, failure to surrender keys, etc., issue of excessiveness |
Stern v. WERC [Court of Appeals] 2006 WI APP 193 |
2005AP3144 |
8/24/2006 |
2006 WI APP 193 |
1) timeliness, relates to competency to proceed, subject to waiver, "effective date of action"; 2) jurisdiction, extension of probation procedure; 3) procedure, parties' right to file arguments on issue of waiver |
Alt v. DOC |
66025 |
9/6/2006 |
31795 |
jurisdiction, employer's actions of investigating allegations of misconduct by the appellant and placing her on paid administrative leave during the investigation |
Kriska v. DOC [affirmed on judicial review] |
65809 |
9/6/2006 |
31796 |
jurisdiction, termination of promotional probationary employment and restoration to a position in the employee's previous classification |
Pasch v. DHFS |
65783 |
9/6/2006 |
31798 |
jurisdiction, termination of promotional probationary employment and restoration to a position in the employee's previous classification; aff'd by Milw. Cty. Cir. Ct., 06-CV-9545, 2/26/07 |
Saveland v. DHFS & DMRS |
66069 |
9/21/2006 |
31815 |
timeliness, appeal of exam results, delivery to WERC employee's home, receipt after 4:30 p.m., absence of express notice of right to appeal |
Wincentsen v. OSER |
66262 |
10/13/2006 |
31866 |
timeliness, meaning of "30 days," equitable estoppel, absence of a causal connection between the allegedly inaccurate information and a delay in filing the appeal |
deMoya v. DVA |
66211 |
10/23/2006 |
31873 |
1) jurisdiction, violation of terms of settlement agreement reached in previous appeals (including an appeal reviewing a career exec reassignment), final step grievance; 2) timeliness, 230.44(4)(c) action for failure to comply |
Perkins v. DOC |
66091 |
11/7/2006 |
31901 |
jurisdiction, termination of promotional probationary employment and restoration to a position in the employee's previous classification |
Schneider v. OSER |
66268 |
11/8/2006 |
31903 |
timeliness, 30th day a Sunday, letter of appeal received by Commission a week after Monday |
Markwardt v. OSER |
66186 |
11/9/2006 |
31902 |
timeliness, filing fee, the first day of the 30-day period is the calendar day after the date of the letter issued by the Commission, the final day is subject to 990.001(4)(c) |
Wincentsen v. OSER |
66262 |
11/20/2006 |
31866-A |
procedure, request to return filing fee after appeal was found to be untimely filed |
Powell v. OSER |
66109 |
11/20/2006 |
31932 |
procedure, request to return filing fee after respondent granted the requested classification relief without a hearing |
Znidarsich v. OSER |
66325 |
12/12/2006 |
31951 |
timeliness, 30 days applies irrespective of heightened work demands and events in personal life (explained further in ruling on petition for rehearing) |
Kriska v. DOC |
65988 |
12/15/2006 |
31957 |
jurisdiction, termination of promotional probation, non-contractual grievance, management rights exclusion, alleged failure to comply with internal procedures and to provide due process |
C. J. v. DOC |
64827 |
1/3/2007 |
31491-A |
merits, initial rate of pay, pay on reinstatement, illegal or an abuse of discretion, equitable estoppel, clear and convincing evidence, no guarantee, subject of the reliance, reasonableness of the reliance |
Danielson & Smith v. OSER |
66180, 66232 |
1/9/2007 |
31977 31978 |
MSJ, classification, leadworker |
Znidarsich v. OSER |
66325 |
1/19/2007 |
31951-A |
timeliness, 30-day filing period not subject to being altered or set aside by the Commission, (matter before the Commission on petition for rehearing) |
Rounds-Rheaume v. UW |
66368 |
1/22/2007 |
31995 |
1) jurisdiction, effect of appellant's state civil service work history on her recent efforts of employment with other employers; 2) timeliness, suspension, 30 days |
Strauss v. DNR |
65501 |
2/22/2007 |
32024 |
jurisdiction, termination during probationary period served on re-hire |
deMoya v. DVA |
66321, 66353, 66354 |
2/22/2007 |
32026,32027,32028 |
procedure, mootness, grievance, appellant no longer employed by agency |
Ryf v. OSER |
66272 |
2/22/2007 |
32025 |
timeliness, apparent discrepancy between date next to signature on receipt and statements by appellant |
Kriska v. WERC |
06-CV-9545 |
2/26/2007 |
Milwaukee County Circuit Court affirmed WERC decision 31796, issued 9/6/2006 |
|
Rounds-Rheaume v. UW |
66368 |
3/6/2007 |
31995-A |
timeliness, appellant on medical leave during the 30-day filing period (matter before the Commission on petition for rehearing) |
Elmer v. DHFS & OSER |
64829 |
3/7/2007 |
31380-B |
1) merits, non-selection, no sanitarian license required for Public Health Sanitarian hire; destruction of interview notes; 2) jurisdiction, non-selection, assignment of duties; 3) jurisdiction, classification, filing fee (fee sought after hearing) |
Schultz v. DWD & OSER |
64589 |
4/10/2007 |
31326-A |
merits, classification, Information Systems Network Services - Senior and Specialist, mis-classified comparison position |
Elmer v. DATCP |
66749 |
5/8/2007 |
32087 |
timeliness, selection decision, when appellant learned he had not been selected, receipt of information that caused applicant to believe decision was improper |
Fabert v. DNR |
66687 |
5/8/2007 |
32089 |
procedure, mootness, non-selection, hiring process halted before selection decision had been made and position no longer existed, lapse of appellant's restoration rights |
Stern v. DWD & DMRS |
63312 |
6/4/2007 |
30912-A |
timeliness, waiver of objection, first asserted on remand from court of appeals, various factors considered, only in unusual circumstances would there be a waiver if objection first voiced at prehearing conference |
Royal v. DHFS & DMRS |
66237 |
6/29/2007 |
31884-A |
merits; 1) decision not to accept application after deadline, 2) decision to rate appellant as "not eligible" after exam |
Somerville v. DOT & OSER |
64631 |
7/24/2007 |
31685-A |
merits, classification, Payroll and Benefits Specialist 2 and 3, progression series, reclassification vs. reallocation, sudden change to language of specifications, district vs. central office positions |
Junceau v. DWD |
64897 |
8/8/2007 |
32050 |
merits, non-selection, choice between two transfer candidates, 230.15 applies to exam, 230.19(1), 230.20(2), alleged bias and conflict of interest by interview panelists, qualifications of panelists, reference check |
Saveland v. DHFS & DMRS |
66447 |
8/9/2007 |
32033-A |
1) merits, exam, not eligible determination, change in standards from earlier exams; 2) timeliness, waiver of objection |
Paulat v. DATCP & OSER |
66502 |
9/10/2007 |
32207 |
timeliness, appeal from decision to initially allocate a vacant position, appellant was applicant to fill vacancy, no written notice requirement under ER 3.04 |
Adams v. DNR |
67102 |
10/9/2007 |
32237 |
jurisdiction, 230.44(1)(d) encompassed allegations that appellant, an "at risk" candidate, was more qualified than person hired who was kept better informed of interview process and attended same church as an interviewer |
Braun v. OSER |
67183 |
10/9/2007 |
32240 |
jurisdiction, appeal of denial of request to create a new classification within an existing classification and then assign appellant's position to the new class, 230.09(2)(am) |
Kriska v. WERC [Court of Appeals] 2008 WI APP 13 |
2007AP813 |
12/11/2007 |
2008 WI APP 13 |
jurisdiction, termination of promotional probation as Supervising Officer 2 and return to SO1 position where he had permanent status in class, 230.44(1)(c) |
Karl v. DOC |
67064 |
12/19/2007 |
32297 |
jurisdiction, 230.45(1)(c), conditions of employment, reliance on interpretations under SELRA, distribution of a letter of discipline to union where disciplined employee was outside of bargaining unit, written agency rules |
Parker v. DOC |
67263 |
12/19/2007 |
32298 |
timeliness, non-selection |
Pollard v. DOA & OSER |
66492 |
1/24/2008 |
32261-A |
merits, classification, regrade, competition, substantial change in duties due to staff reductions, vacancies and legislative directives |
Bakken et al. v. DWD |
66543 |
1/25/2008 |
32086-B |
merits, 230.44(1)(d), non-selection, access to computer for writing sample, training of interviewers, failure to notify of later selection process or of later non-selection, appointments within 60 days, 230.25, backdating of hiring date |
Mattson v. OSER |
62835 |
1/30/2008 |
32263 |
merits, reallocation, Engineering Specialist-Transportation Senior, Engineering Tecnician-Transportation Advanced 2, professional engineering work |
Kwart Moore v. DOJ |
67507 |
2/11/2008 |
32351 |
timeliness, rescission of employment offer, contact with higher-ranking administrators after decision |
Gruentzel v. DNR |
66927 67375 |
2/11/2008 |
32352 32353 |
jurisdiction, 230.44(1)(c), demotion, constructive demotion, temporary vs. permanent reassignment of duties, 7 months |
Reynolds v. DWD |
66159 |
2/12/2008 |
32291 |
merits, 230.44(1)(d), non-selection, merit and fitness, 230.15 and .16, experience of candidates, contacting references, pre-selection, interview questions and benchmarks |
Elmer v. DATCP |
66236 |
2/14/2008 |
32289 |
merits, 230.44(1)(d), non-selection, merit and fitness, 230.15, bias due to settlement of appellant's prior claim of whistleblower retaliation, rating and interview panels restricted to persons with limited contact with appellant |
Koenig v. DPI |
65530 |
3/6/2008 |
32145 |
merits, discipline, discharge, numerous emails with sexual content to eight different women including four high school students and an employee of a school district, effect on agency |
Harrsch v. OSPD |
67255 67256 |
3/11/2008 |
32375 32376 |
1) jurisdiction: 230.45(1)(c) as non-employee; 230.44(1)(d) of misstatement of reason for rescinding offer, compensation for completing forms, refusal to allow app. to have rep.; 2) timeliness, failure to compensate |
Boeck v. UWHCB & OSER |
67063 |
3/12/2008 |
32307 |
merits, classification, UWHC Department Assistant and UWHC Scheduler-Objective, majority of time, position description relied on stock language |
Brister-Cooper v. UW |
65176 |
3/25/2008 |
32290 |
merits, discipline, discharge, Police Sergeant, misconduct in releasing bicycle from police storage and cover-up, improperly assigning a subordinate to an event and cover-up, import of truthfulness of police |
Gawenda v. DFI & DMRS |
65882 66750 |
4/15/2008 |
32401 32402 |
1) potential remedy in layoff appeal after subsequent demotion in lieu of layoff, mootness; 2) MSJ, dispute of fact; 3) mootness, allegation of constructive demotion where app later moved to other position |
Stewart v. DMRS |
67652 |
6/25/2008 |
32462 |
timeliness, filing fee, 30 days is mandatory |
Holland v. OSER |
66221 |
7/7/2008 |
31885-A |
merits, classification, Medical Staff Assistant and Medical Program Assistant-Senior, advanced paraprofessional, difference between actual duties and position description of comparator position |
Jackson-Ward v. DOR |
66942 |
7/15/2008 |
32471 |
1) jurisdiction, reprimand vs. reprimand in lieu of suspension; 2) mootness, effect of leaving agency on appeal of discipline; 3) timeliness, constructive demotion for career executive, burden of proof |
Carr v. DOC |
63240 |
8/13/2008 |
32521 |
procedure, claim preclusion, effect of prior federal court rulings on discharge appeal, exclusive jurisdiction, issue preclusion, issues actually litigated and decided, fundamental fairness, burden of persuasion |
Dillman v. DOC |
65092 |
8/15/2008 |
31545-B |
merits, suspension, supervising officer, cell extraction, use of force, inmate was a relative, request to reopen record, request for costs and fees |
L'Esperance v. DOT |
66926 |
8/15/2008 |
32406 |
merits, demotion, police communications supervisor, insubordination |
Haakma v. DVA |
67860 |
8/23/2008 |
32466 |
merits, non-selection, interviewers' rating criteria not of record, successful candidates already worked at facility |
Molnar v. DOC (issued by Examiner CAB) |
67495 |
8/27/2008 |
32336-A |
procedure, evidence, polygraph examination, request to compel exam of others, |
Parker v. DOC |
67264 67265 |
10/14/2008 |
32481 32482 |
merits 1) decision to terminate eligibility for reinstatement before end of 5-year period is illegal, reliance on information provided in reference questionnaires, 2) non-selection; remedy |
Molnar v. DOC (issued by Examiner CAB) |
67495 |
10/17/2008 |
32336-B |
procedure, discovery, request to reschedule deposition of respondent's witness after failure of appellant's attorney to appear and to make arrangements for a court reporter |
Peterson v. DNR |
68070 |
11/3/2008 |
32605 |
jurisdiction, resignation coerced or voluntary, appellant had posed written questions about effect of resignation on benefits, received written response and received financial benefits from resignation |
Dotson v. DOC |
67843 |
11/11/2008 |
32527-A |
merits, non-selection, had previously been terminated during probationary period for alleged misconduct, no showing that panelists were aware of termination |
Schigur v. DOJ |
68096 |
12/16/2008 |
32627 |
jurisdiction, 230.44(1)(c), permanent status in class, trial period upon promotion to career executive position, requisites for waiver of portion of trial period, 230.44(1)(a), 230.44(1)(d), removal decisions |
Czynzak-Lyne v. OSER |
66164 |
12/26/2008 |
32633 |
MSJ, classification, University Services Program Assistant, Academic Department Specialist, program vs. department |
Dillman v DOC |
65092 |
1/8/2009 |
31545-C |
Summary dismissal order (due to settlement) |
Boyea v. DOC |
68260 |
1/13/2009 |
32647 |
timeliness, decision to terminate promotional probation and restore to position in previous classification, employer had no affirmative obligation to notify employee of a right to appeal |
Karre v. UW |
68194 |
1/26/2009 |
32655 |
timeliness, discharge, effective date, date of notification, receipt of retirement information that could have influenced appellant's settlement posture is not relevant to timeliness determination |
Stiefvater v. DOC |
68299 |
2/18/2009 |
32678 |
procedure, 227.483 motion for costs and fees for frivolously filed claim arising from probationary term, appellant never knowingly pursued claim under 230.44(1)(c) and never submitted .45(1)(c) filing fee |
Allen v. DOC [affirmed on judicial review] |
66968 |
5/6/2009 |
32557 |
1) jurisdiction, involuntary transfer as part of letter of discipline; 2) merits, discipline, suspension, physical contact, touch of buttocks, construction of harassment work rule, zone of privacy, due process |
Harrsch v. OSPD |
67256 |
5/8/2009 |
32376-A |
merits, 230.44(1)(d),non-selection, rescission of employment offer, employment background check, ER-MRS 1.02(2), appointment, effect of completing new employee forms, review of another agency's personnel records |
Trzebiatowski v. OSER |
62827 |
5/12/2009 |
31949-A |
merits, classification, Engineering Specialist-Transportation Senior, Engineering Technician-Transportation Advanced 2, Surveyor-Senior, professional engineering work, right-of-way plat technician |
Ryan v. DWD |
68155 |
5/18/2009 |
32651-A |
1) procedure, issue for hearing; 2) merits, grievance, temporary assignment exceeding 6 months, subsequent extension, agency written policy; 3) remedy, EAJA, fees and costs, filing fee, no response to request |
Sweeney v. DOC (issued by examiner CAB) |
67936 |
5/21/2009 |
32467-B |
procedure, protective order, request for release from order limiting use of discovery materials, no finding of fraud, misunderstanding, or mistake. |
Thom v. DOC (issued by examiner RJ) |
68285 |
5/26/2009 |
32746-A |
MSJ, 230.44(1)(c), discharge, pro se, issues of fact |
Jackson-Ward v. DOR |
66942 |
6/3/2009 |
32471-A |
EAJA, 227.485, appellant not “prevailing party”, discipline removed from personnel file in normal course of business, not because appeal was filed |
Wendel v. DOC |
68822 |
6/29/2009 |
32782 |
jurisdiction, probationary termination, no permanent status in class under 230.44(1)(c) |
Hewko v. OSER |
68068 |
7/2/2009 |
32714 |
1) merits, classification, University Services Associate 2 and IS Resources Support Technician-Intermediate, general not limited supervision; 2) procedure, calling witnesses named by objecting party allowed, PC 4.02 |
Peachey v. DOC |
68829 |
8/4/2009 |
32820 |
jurisdiction, 230.44(1)(c), duration of probation, reinstatement into a different employing unit, 6 vs. 12 months |
Hewko v. OSER |
68068 |
8/5/2009 |
32714-A |
petition for rehearing denied, 227.49(3), no error of law or fact, no discovery of new evidence |
Karre v. UW |
67997 |
8/6/2009 |
32826 |
1) jurisdiction, 230.44(1)(c), suspension and written reprimand in lieu of suspension; 2) timeliness, discipline withdrawn and reissued, receipt, 230.44(3) |
Scissom v. DOC |
68910 |
8/17/2009 |
32832 |
jurisdiction, medical termination or discharge of represented employee, 230.44(1)(f), 230.44(1)(c), effect of bargaining agreement, 230.34(1), 111.93(3) |
Peterson v. DOA & OSER |
68341 |
9/16/2009 |
32814-A |
merits, classification, Custodian Lead and Facilities Repair Worker, best fit, class specifications prevail over equitable considerations |
Hanevold v. DOA & OSER |
68342 |
9/16/2009 |
32815-A |
merits, classification, Custodian Lead and Facilities Repair Worker, best fit, class specifications prevail over equitable considerations |
Adams v. DNR |
67102 |
9/17/2009 |
32398-A |
merits, non-selection, 230.44(1)(d), both candidates highly qualified, rational basis for interview scores, employer not obligated to hire at-risk employee, "competency-based hiring", alleged bias of panelists |
McCreedy v. DOC |
68974 |
10/14/2009 |
32887 |
timeliness, 230.44(3), filing period, calendar days not business days, employer had no duty to clarify |
Garcia v. DOC |
69110 |
10/26/2009 |
32890 |
jurisdiction, 230.44(1)(c), written reprimand, employee erroneously informed that appeal could be taken |
Gabower v. DHS |
68172 |
11/5/2009 |
32898 |
jurisdiction, 230.44(1)(c), 230.44(1)(d), threat of discharge, coerced resignation and refusal to rescind, failure to reinstate, 230.34(1), 230.31(1), ER 21.02(2), effect of collective bargaining agreement |
Schigur v. DOJ |
68096 |
11/10/2009 |
32626-B |
jurisdiction, 230.44(1)(c), permanent status in class, promotion to career executive, ER-MRS 30.61(1), alleged waiver of portion of probationary period and failure to inform of performance concerns |
Delarossa v. DOT & OSER |
68687 |
12/8/2009 |
32734-A |
merits, classification, Transportation Customer Representative-Senior and Advanced, best fit, not a majority of time on problem driver queue responsibilities |
Graf v. DOT& OSER |
68688 |
12/8/2009 |
32733-A |
merits, classification, Transportation Customer Representative-Senior and Advanced, best fit, not a majority of time on problem driver queue responsibilities |
Thiel v. DOT |
64379 |
12/16/2009 |
31725-A |
jurisdiction, 230.44(1)(c), 230.44(1)(d), constructive demotion, lower class, same pay range, related to hiring process, involuntary transfer (removal from vs. appointment to), reassignment |
Thiel v. DOT |
65169 |
12/16/2009 |
31726-A |
merits, 230.44(1)(d), non-selection, re-announcements, effect of ranked list from interview panel, 230.18 |
Meier-O'Brien v. DOA |
69045 |
1/28/2010 |
32955 |
1) jurisdiction, Fair Employment Act discrimination and retaliation claims; 2) timeliness, 230.44(3), classification, discharge |
Disterhaft v. DNR |
69183 |
2/10/2010 |
32962 |
jurisdiction, 230.44(1)(c), discipline, termination and actions leading to termination, limited term employment, no permanent status |
Dohms v. DOC |
69220 |
2/12/2010 |
32974 |
timeliness, 230.44(3), discipline, written reprimand in lieu of suspension, absence of negligence by appellant or information from respndt not exceptions to timeliness defense, appeal rather than grievance |
Galligan v. DOC & DMRS |
68571 |
2/26/2010 |
32987 |
1) jurisdiction, 230.44(1)(a), alleged failure of employer to seek authorization to transfer; 2) MSJ, 230.44(1)(c), constructive demotion, no change in position number, specifications and time allocations not in evidence |
Meier-O'Brien v. DOA |
69045 |
2/26/2010 |
32955-A |
petition for rehearing denied, no error of law or discovery of new evidence |
Lyddy v. Village of Camp Douglas |
69295 |
2/26/2010 |
32989 |
jurisdiction, 230.44(1)(c), discipline, termination, village employee is not state employee |
Barton v. WDVA |
67171 |
3/2/2010 |
32417-A |
1) jurisdiction, 230.44(1)(c ), proof of permanent status; 2) merits, 230.44(1)(c), layoff, approval for precipitating reorganization, 15.02(3), 16.705, rationale for reorganization |
Leaverton v. WDVA |
67159 |
3/2/2010 |
32416-A |
1) jurisdiction, 230.44(1)(c ), proof of permanent status; 2) merits, 230.44(1)(c), layoff, approval for precipitating reorganization, 15.02(3), 16.705, rationale for reorganization |
Allen v. WERC |
09CV523 |
3/16/2010 |
32557-C1 |
Dodge County Circuit Court affirmed WERC decision 32557, issued 5/6/2009 |
Harrsch v. DWD & OSER |
69340 |
4/28/2010 |
33023 |
timeliness, 230.44(3), alleged violation of neutral reference provision in resignation agreement |
Sweeney v. DOC |
68686 |
5/12/2010 |
32959 |
procedure, order to reopen hearing, evidence, 230.44(1)(d), non-selection, admissibility of evidence of employer's pre-certification conduct, relevance, pre-hearing comments by examiner, pro se appellant |
Sweeney v. DOC |
67936 |
6/3/2010 |
32775 |
merits, 230.44(1)(d) non-selection, linking pre-certification conduct by agency, alleged bias for internal candidates, interview preparation, scoring methodology, reference check procedure |
Gerstmeyer v. DHS & OSER |
68449 |
6/3/2010 |
32930 |
merits, classification, Office Associate, Office Operations Associate, exercising analytical or independent reasoning, complex program-related or administrative functions, uniqueness of position |
Booth v. DHS & OSER |
68774 |
7/8/2010 |
32809-B |
1) merits, classification, effective date, equitable estoppel, reorganization; 2) procedure, evidence, hearsay |
Wagner v. DHS & OSER |
68775 |
7/8/2010 |
32810-B |
1) merits, classification, effective date, equitable estoppel, reorganization; 2) procedure, evidence, hearsay |
Prodoehl v. DHS & OSER |
68773 |
7/8/2010 |
32808-B |
1) merits, classification, effective date, equitable estoppel, reorganization; 2) procedure, evidence, hearsay |
Arndt et al. v. DHS |
68252 |
8/6/2010 |
32687-A |
230.44(1)(d) non-selection; 1) jurisdiction, discrimination claim; 2) procedure, causation standard and sequence; 3) merits, reference checks, 230.20(2), only one candidate had access to PD; causation |
Middleton v. DOC |
69783 |
9/8/2010 |
33116 |
1) jurisdiction, written reprimand, inaccurate statement in letter of right to appeal; 2) remedy, 227.483 fee request |
Weber v. DFI |
69996 |
10/12/2010 |
33147 |
jurisdiction, discipline, effect of bargaining agreement, 230.34(1) |
Weber v. DFI |
70064 |
10/12/2010 |
33148 |
jurisdiction, discipline, effect of bargaining agreement, 230.34(1) |
Middleton v. DOC |
70151 |
11/2/2010 |
33159 |
timeliness, 230.44(3), reprimand in lieu of a suspension |
D. L. v. UW |
69581 |
11/17/2010 |
33131 |
procedure, failure to appear at hearing; good cause determination |
Thom v. DOC |
68285 |
11/19/2010 |
32746-C |
procedure, reopen hearing, after proposed decision, materiall available at time of hearing but not offered |
Larson v. DOC & DMRS |
68983 |
12/2/2010 |
33140 |
merits, 230.44(1)(a), exam, failing score, objectively scored, job-related benchmarks, "professional" work experience, results of prior examinations, subjective judgment |
Thom v. DOC [appeal pending] |
68285 |
12/8/2010 |
32746-B |
1) merits, 230.44(1)(c), discharge, dispensing gas into personal vehicle from State pump, theft vs. replenishing, unauthorized possession or improper use of property, excessive disc.; 2) remedy, 227.483 |
Hansen v. DOC |
69313 |
12/20/2010 |
33192 |
timeliness, of application for hazardous duty pay benefits, initial denial on grounds other than timeliness |
Langworthy v. DOC |
69812 |
1/26/2011 |
33211-A |
procedure, request to reopen, dismissal order issued under misapprehension of desire to withdraw |
Johnson v. DOC [appeal pending] |
67937 |
2/10/2011 |
32784-A |
merits, 230.44(1)(c), demotion, prison setting, threatening harm, intimidating, failure to provide accurate information, due process during investigation |
Hewko v. OSER |
70085 |
3/3/2011 |
33137-A |
motion for summary judgment, classification, pro se party's ability to advance a defense, material facts in dispute |
Allen v. WERC |
2010AP1149 |
3/4/2011 |
|
District IV, Wisconsin Court of Appeals, affirmed WERC decision 32557 issued 5/6/2009 |
Elmer v. DHS |
70328 |
3/22/2011 |
33179-A |
timeliness, non-selection, date of notification of decision, date appellant learned of reason for non-selection, no obligation to inform candidate of reason for decision |
Thom v. DOC [appeal pending] |
68285 |
3/23/2011 |
32746-D |
EAJA, 227.485, discipline, partially prevailing party, substantially justified, whether agency over-litigated case can serve as factor |
Biasi & Smith v. UW |
69862 |
4/6/2011 |
33276 |
jurisdiction, 4th-step grievance, wages, whether appellants satisfied compensation plan conditions for receiving overtime |
M.S. v. UW & DMRS [appeal pending] |
69216 |
4/11/2011 |
33128 |
1) merits, exam, certification list, veterans preference points, 230.03(14)(d), statutory construction, honorable conditions, period of service; 2) remedy, whether or not position is vacant |
Galligan v. DOC |
68571 |
4/18/2011 |
32987-B |
merits, 230.44(1)(c), constructive demotion, lower class level, temporary vs. permanently assigned duties, prison supervisor duty assignments, desirability of assignments |
Clark-Dyett v. DHS |
70548 |
5/9/2011 |
33234-A |
timeliness, non-selection, notification, no duty to inform of appeal rights, method of delivery of appeal, effort to resolve concern before filing |
Kasper v. DHS |
70549 |
5/9/2011 |
33235-A |
timeliness, non-selection, notification, no duty to inform of appeal rights, method of delivery of appeal, effort to resolve concern before filing, status as non-attorney |
M.S. v. UW & DMRS [appeal pending] |
69216 |
6/14/2011 |
33128-A |
EAJA, 227.485, exam, substantially justified, consultation with other agencies, open to reconsideration, appellant declined to supply material document until just before hearing, proposed decision rejected |
Alexander v. DHS |
70734 |
8/2/2011 |
33327 |
jurisdiction, 230.44(1)(h), termination during probationary period, employed by Milwaukee County, effect of erroneous advice |
Winslow-Stanley v. DOC |
69975 |
11/4/2011 |
33213-A |
merits, discipline, reprimand in lieu of a 3-day suspension, due process during investigation, kissing subordinate and engaging in off-color or sexual banter, prison setting, excessiveness factors |
Winslow-Stanley v. DOC |
69976 |
11/4/2011 |
33214-A |
merits, discipline, 5-day suspension, due process during investigation, referring to employee X derogatorily, grabbing X, threatening to discipline X for insubordination, prison setting, excessiveness factors |
Langworthy v. DOC |
69812 |
11/4/2011 |
33211-C |
procedure, lack of prosecution, abandonment of claim, egregious conduct, failure to act timely and provide appropriate notice and information relating to claim, no clear and justifiable excuse, |
Hamblin v. WERC & Thom |
11-CV-1865 |
11/14/2011 |
|
Dane County Circuit Court, Branch 1, affirmed WERC decision 32746-B issued 12/8/2010 |
Decker v. DOC |
70160 |
12/1/2011 |
33593 |
jurisdiction, discipline, 230.44(1)(c), letter of reprimand in lieu of a suspension withdrawn and replaced with letter of reprimand after appeal was filed |
Rakowski v. DWD |
70528 |
1/17/2012 |
33231-B |
merits, 230.44(1)(d), non-selection, challenge to reasonableness of assessment of appellant by interview panel, bias allegation, consistency between panelists' notes, appellant's demeanor during interview |
Molnar v. DOC |
67495 |
1/20/2012 |
32336-C |
merits, discipline, demotion, pattern of harassing behavior, denial during investigation, email from home to co-worker at work does not violate rule premised on acting in the course of one's employment |
UW & OSER v. WERC |
11-CV-2873 |
2/7/2012 |
|
Dane County Circuit Court, Branch 1, affirmed WERC decision 32128 issued 4/11/2011 |
Wistrom v. DVA (also see 33180-D) |
70313 |
2/17/2012 |
33180-B |
jurisdiction, career executive reassignment, permanent vs. temporary, unrefuted affidavits as basis for decision |
Russell v. UW (issued by examiner MG) |
69722 |
3/29/2012 |
33845-A |
1) MSJ (by appellant) or to exclude evidence, discipline, discharge, common law spoliation rule, evidentiary standard in administrative proceeding; 2) procedure, discovery, sanctions where no order was issued |
Langworthy v. DOC |
70785 |
7/10/2012 |
33316-B |
merits, discipline, discharge, prison setting, captain, sexual harassment and lying during investigation |
Wistrom v. DVA (issued by examiner JCC) |
70313 |
8/15/2012 |
33180-D |
jurisdiction, 230.44(1)(c), constructive discharge claim arising from temporary assignment of career executive, health status of appellant, commuting distance caused by assignment |