KEY TOPIC TABLE FOR
STATE CIVIL SERVICE APPEALS DECISIONS BY PERSONNEL COMMISSION 1999-2001
|
Decisions Issued |
|||
|
Case Name |
Case Number |
Date |
Description |
|
Oriedo v. DPI |
96-0124-PC-ER |
12/3/1997 |
lack of prosecution, motion to dismiss for failure to appear at hearing, failure to show good cause |
|
Hawk v. DOCom |
4/7/1999 |
ER: 1) jur, probationary termination; 2) failure to state claim, inference of claim of discriminatory motive; 3) issue preclusion/claim preclusion, failure to file evidence of the nature of the other proceedings |
|
|
Rupiper v. DOC |
|
4/7/1999 |
LOP, egregious conduct, failure to proceed with hearing in light of denial of request for postponement, no clear and justifiable excuse |
|
Brown v. DOC |
|
4/21/1999 |
appeal, jurisdiction, alleged withdrawal of offer of a position |
|
Oriedo v. DOC |
|
4/21/1999 |
discovery, motion for protective order, failure of moving party to seek to resolve dispute informally despite directive |
|
Starck v. DOC |
4/21/1999 |
appeal, non-selection, financial specialist, better references, correlation of scores of panelists, alleged illegality of race/sex discrimination is outside of issue for hearing |
|
|
Opperman v. DOC |
5/7/1999 |
appeal, merits, non-selection (reinstatement), poor performance in prior position with respondent |
|
|
Lehman v. DNR |
5/19/1999 |
finding that settlement agreement had been reached between the parties, "meeting of minds", request to reschedule hearing |
|
|
Sheskey v. DER |
|
5/24/1999 |
request to disqualify PC due to 2 prior cases before PC |
|
Sheskey v. Pers. Comm. |
|
5/24/1999 |
motion to disqualify PC due to processing prior cases by commission. No employment relationship between C and PC when PC processes discrimination claim. |
|
Sheskey v. DETF & DER |
|
5/25/1999 |
1) jur - determination by DETF to deny disability annuity; 2) timeliness, duty to make inquiry; 3) discovery duplicating open records request |
|
Hawk v. DOCom |
|
6/2/1999 |
MSJ, termination, NO/A, race (denied, citing Masuca) |
|
Oriedo v. DPI |
|
6/2/1999 |
FEA, issue for hearing, disparate impact, effect of filing brief one day late |
|
Starck v. DHFS |
|
6/2/1999 |
appeal, jurisdiction, LTE hire |
|
Benson v. UW (whitewater) |
|
6/2/1999 |
dismissal of complaint (for failing to correct inappropriate language in complaint) for failure to meet standard of decorum |
|
Sheskey v. DER |
|
6/3/1999 |
pet for rehearing, request to disqualify PC due to having filed complaint against PC, newly discovered evidence, request to place case on hold pending Court of Appeals decision |
|
Willis v. DHFS & DER |
|
6/3/1999 |
reclass, Financial Clerk Specialist 1 and 2 |
|
Harwell v. DPI |
|
6/21/1999 |
procedure, consolidation for hearing, application of discretion |
|
Holley v. DOCom |
|
6/21/1999 |
request to amend appeal to add FEA claim, request made after hearing on appeal |
|
Stellings v. DOC |
|
6/21/1999 |
appeal, merits, suspension, prison captain, failure to document use of force, directing subordinate to alter report, disciplinary due process |
|
Holis v. DOT |
|
6/23/1999 |
MSJ, disability, motion premised on failure to respond to request for admissions, effect of postponment on pending discovery request |
|
Woods v. UW-Madison |
|
6/28/1999 |
pet for rehrg, effect of oral notice of termination on filing period |
|
Arcamo v. UW-Milwaukee |
|
6/30/1999 |
procedure, request to disqualify and substitute equal rights officer, ex parte communications |
|
Langford v. SPD |
|
6/30/1999 |
ER, procedure, pleading requirements, effect of settlement of federal suit on events prior to signature date, adequate notice to respondent of allegations prior to hearing where investigation is waived |
|
Snider Allen v. DER |
|
6/30/1999 |
MSJ; 1) reallocation; 2) procedure, a) alleged conflict of interest within respondent, b) request to modify issue to include additional classification |
|
Swallow (Thompson) v.DOC |
|
6/30/1999 |
1) appeal, merits non-selection; 2) ER, merits, WB, non-hire |
|
Coenen v. UW-Madison |
|
7/14/1999 |
timeliness, non-selection, no duty to notify of appeal rights, time not tolled by open records request |
|
Allison v. DOR |
|
7/20/1999 |
discovery, reasonable expenses on failure to appear at deposition, no substantial justification |
|
Cunningham v. DOC |
|
7/20/1999 |
failure to state claim (not MSJ), ER, WB/nat. guard, requirement that C produce documentation of military leave not a disciplinary action or an adverse personnel action, WB complaint is protected WB activity |
|
Johnson v. DOC & DER |
|
7/20/1999 |
reclass, Food Production Assistant 2 to 3 |
|
Boutwell-Pitt v. DWD |
|
7/28/1999 |
ER, timeliness, no effect of pending grievance and inaccurate information from union rep |
|
Hintz v. DOC |
|
8/2/1999 |
appeal, merits, discipline, suspension and demotion, failure to deliver quality health care and to establish policies, false information, comparison to others who were not disciplined for related conduct |
|
Yerges v. DMRS |
|
8/11/1999 |
timeliness, appellant failed to indicate when he rec'd written notice of removal of name from register or to dispute R's statement of "normal mail deliver, R's later "correction" of 1st letter to add reason for action did not change filing period |
|
Brown v. DOC |
|
8/25/1999 |
appeal, non-selection; 1)whether an alleged offer and acceptance created a contractual obligation; 2) abuse of discretion, consideration of prior employment |
|
Esqueda v. DWD |
|
8/25/1999 |
appeal, timeliness, failure to make selection within 60 days of certification, effect of letter from PC investigator asking C to clarify if he also wants to file appeal |
|
Kleinsteiber v. DOC |
|
8/25/1999 |
appeal, discipline: 1) remedy, 230.43(4), mitigation, reasonable diligence to seek other employment, substantially comparable, effect of offer of reinstatement; 2) evidence, failure to exchange "rebuttal" evidence |
|
Stacy v. DOC |
|
8/25/1999 |
appeal, timeliness, transfer (is alleged defacto discipline), equitable estoppel |
|
Starck v. UW |
|
8/25/1999 |
failure to state claim, appeal of agency's request to remove name from cert list |
|
Nelson v. DOT & DER |
|
8/27/1999 |
reclass: 1) MSJ; 2) discovery, appellant allowed to withdraw an admission where admission was due to C's misinterpretation of discovery deadline |
|
Pike v. DOT & DER |
|
8/27/1999 |
reclass: 1) MSJ; 2) discovery, appellant allowed to withdraw an admission where admission was due to C's misinterpretation of discovery deadline |
|
Van Beek v. DOT & DER |
|
8/31/1999 |
reclass, Engineering Technician Transportation 3 to 4 |
|
Brenon v. UW |
|
9/1/1999 |
appeal, remedy, suspension & discharge, mitigation of damages, calculating interim earnings, after-acquired evidence, failure to provide notice of new issue in case |
|
Balele v. DOA et al. |
|
9/7/1999 |
procedure, appearance letters, proper witnesses, request to require Governor to testify |
|
Allison v. DOR |
|
9/8/1999 |
discovery, failure to appear at deposition, reasonable expenses, award against client not attorney |
|
Schneider v. DOC |
|
9/8/1999 |
appeal, 230.36 benefits, timeliness of initial request for benefits |
|
Olmanson v. DHFS |
|
9/15/1999 |
evidence, offer of deposition, opposing party may supplement with other parts, 804.07(1)(d) |
|
Honer v. DOT |
|
9/22/1999 |
ER, procedure, request to hold in abeyance pending related federal proceedings |
|
Stacy v. DOC |
|
10/6/1999 |
appeal, timeliness, effect of cancellation of 3rd step grievance hearing |
|
Starck v. UW |
|
10/6/1999 |
failure to state claim, 230.44(1)(d), request to remove C's name from certification list |
|
Poole v. UW |
|
11/3/1999 |
appeal, failure to state a claim, hire, relative qualifications, pre-selection |
|
Staples v. SPD |
|
11/3/1999 |
ER, remedy, non-selection, FEA rather than EAJA applies, complainant's own time spent, C's incidental and collateral expenses, travel, witness costs, copies, postage, paper, phone calls |
|
Harwell v. DPI |
98-0210-PC-ER, 99-0051, 0063, 0096-PC-ER
|
11/5/1999 |
ER: 1) amendment, atmosphere of discrimination; 2) discovery, motion to compel, for info about any discrim practiced by any R employee, interrogatories directing R to ask certain ees certain questions; 3) discovery, motion to extend discovery period |
|
Balele v. DOT |
|
11/19/1999 |
ER, timeliness, hires: 1) continuing violation theory, use of career executive option to fill vacancies; 2) equitable tolling/estoppel, failure to advertise positions |
|
Brenon v. UW |
|
11/19/1999 |
appeal, remedy; 1) after acquired evidence, notice of hearing issue, unlawful retroactive discharge; 2) attorneys fees, from ancillary proceedings, substantially justified |
|
Sabol v. UW (Eau Claire) |
|
11/19/1999 |
ER, timeliness, OSHA, calculated from failure to appoint C rather than decision to appoint someone else, non-final or conditional decision |
|
Stellings v. DOC |
|
11/19/1999 |
appeal, jurisdiction, suspension on non-consecutive rather than consecutive days |
|
Wachtel v. DOC |
|
11/19/1999 |
appeal, jurisdiction, MSJ, constructive discharge, voluntary resignation |
|
Balele v. DER & DMRS |
|
12/3/1999 |
discovery, failure to comply with motion to compel, bad faith, sanctions, dismissal |
|
Sleik v. DOCom |
|
12/3/1999 |
procedure: 1) withdrawal request after proposed decision issued, effect of PC decision on Title VII claim; 2) request to disqualify examiner, timing of request; 3) hearing postponement, C under influence of narcotic at time of hearing |
|
Ostenso v. DNR & DER |
|
12/16/1999 |
reclass, Water Resources Engineer Advanced 1 and 2, logical and gradual change |
|
Alvarado-Ortiz v. DOC |
|
12/27/1999 |
ER: 1) procedure, late request for oral argument or extension on objection; 2) merits, race, color, NO, FEA retal, reprimand, terms and conditions, adverse actions |
|
Balele v. UW-Madison |
page 1 missing |
1/19/2000 |
procedure: 1) postponement request; 2) request for dismissal without prejudice (unprepared to go forward with hearing after denial of postponement request) |
|
Fondow v. DOR |
|
1/19/2000 |
protective order, information regarding another employee's disability, disciplinary records |
|
Hawk v. DOCom |
|
1/19/2000 |
1) discovery, motion to compel, record creation; 2) motion to dismiss due to improper conduct, threat to intimidate witness by referencing additional litigation (also see 4/7/2000 ruling) |
|
Kovacik v. DHFS |
|
1/19/2000 |
issue for hearing, initial interview panel's recommendation rejected and new process initiated [see motion for reconsider/clarification issued on 4/19/2000 |
|
Logan v. UW-Milwaukee |
|
1/19/2000 |
discovery, motion for protective order, timeliness of motion, discovery available during investigation stage, vs. open records, balancing with protection of student identities, prior provision of same information [see 3/17/00 motion reconsider] |
|
Oriedo v. DOC |
|
1/19/2000 |
procedure, request for oral argument, exercise of discretion |
|
Bare v. DOT |
|
1/25/2000 |
ER, timeliness, effect of filing complaint by fax |
|
Raisanen v. DOC |
|
1/25/2000 |
evidence, motion in limine, effect of filing proposed exhibits by fax or e-mail, considering factors in PC 4.02 |
|
Balele v. DATCP, DER & DMRS |
|
2/11/2000 |
procedure, disqualification of examiner |
|
Jensen v. DPI |
|
2/11/2000 |
timeliness, objection raised at hearing on merits, waiver of objection |
|
Langford v. SPD |
|
2/11/2000 |
MSJ, allegations barred by settlement agreement in prior case, adverse action (comment that C had conviction record), WB disciplinary action |
|
Rodgers v. DOC |
|
2/11/2000 |
appeal, discipline, just cause, travel, offensive language |
|
Shimkus v. DOC |
|
2/11/2000 |
discovery, protective order, to maintain confidentiality of information about job applicants other than C |
|
Sonnleitner v. DHFS |
|
2/18/2000 |
appeal, discipline, just cause (sexual comments, conduct contrary to treatment program of residents) |
|
Balele v. DER & DMRS |
|
2/28/2000 |
discovery, sanctions, reasonable expenses, authority for, partial success on motion |
|
Brooke v. UW & DER |
|
2/28/2000 |
reclass: 1)Instrument Maker-Entry and Physical Sciences Laboratory Ultra High Vacuum Specialist, best fit, majority of time; 2) effective date, equitable estoppel |
|
Harris v. DPI |
|
3/10/2000 |
appeal, constructive discharge/coerced resignation, no coercion |
|
Poole v. UW |
|
3/10/2000 |
appeal, MSJ, non-selection, insufficient information about interview and decisional process |
|
Logan & Samsel v. UW-Milwaukee |
|
3/17/2000 |
1) procedure, role of Comm. precedent, ruling vacated, no hearing req'd in "contested case" under 227.45(7); 2) discovery, sanctions for failure to comply with order to compel |
|
Allison v. DOR |
|
3/21/2000 |
discovery, failure to comply with order to pay costs, dismiss as sanction, bad faith standard, PC lacks authority to award costs for failure to comply with order to pay costs |
|
Sanford v. DER |
file is undated 2000 |
3/21/2000 |
appeal, reallocation, Financial Specialist 3 or Engineering Specialist-Transportation-Journey |
|
Bedynek-Stumm v. DPI |
|
4/7/2000 |
discovery, protective order, exam and selection materials |
|
Carratt v. DOC |
|
4/7/2000 |
discovery, motion to compel, interview notes from previous selection process for Complainant |
|
Fraser v. DOC |
|
4/7/2000 |
discipline, merits, just cause analysis, youth counselor at juvenile correctional facility, excessive force, vulgar language |
|
Hawk v. DOCom |
|
4/7/2000 |
discovery, motion for protective order, "reasonably calculated to discovery of admissible evidence", sanction for violating order to compel, deposition of agency head, failure to make clear showing info not obtainable from another person |
|
Starck v. UWHCB |
|
4/7/2000 |
appeal, merits, non-selection, hospital supply clerk, mailing clerk, relative qualifications |
|
Verhaagh v. DOT |
|
4/7/2000 |
ER, failure to state a claim, age/sex, non-selection, effect of C's subsequent hire into another vacancy in a field in which she expressed greater interest |
|
Kovacik v. DHFS |
|
4/19/2000 |
procedure, proper scope of motion to reconsider, issue for hearing, recommendation of initial panel rejected |
|
Matakas v. DOC |
|
4/19/2000 |
appeal, merits, non-selection, supervising officer, failure to contact listed references, effect of incorrect tally of numerical scores |
|
Sonnleitner v. DHSS [DHFS] |
|
4/19/2000 |
EAJA, failure to file motion for fees and costs within 30 day period, "substantially justified" |
|
Hagmann v. UW (Eau Claire) |
file is undated 2000 |
4/25/2000 |
ER, fees & costs, partial success on merits (5 of 23 allegations), objections to certain hours claimed, photocopies, fax costs, Fed Express charges, "expert" witness fee, substitution of counsel for Complainant |
|
Campbell v. UW & DER |
|
5/3/2000 |
appeal, reclass, Experimental Farm Laborer and Farm Equipment Operator |
|
Brooke v. UW & DER |
|
5/15/2000 |
EAJA, substantially justified (reclass), filing fee, hearing tapes, attorney fees in preparing case even though complainant appeared pro se, valid attorney-client relationship |
|
Nelson v. SHS |
|
5/31/2000 |
appeal, jurisdiction, pay rate during acting assignment, duration of acting assignment (action by appointing authority) |
|
Sheskey v. DER |
|
5/31/2000 |
procedure, dismissal, complainant lacks standing to oppose request by bankruptcy trustee to dismiss pursuant to settlement agreement |
|
Sheskey v. DER & DETF |
|
5/31/2000 |
procedure, dismissal, complainant lacks standing to oppose request by bankruptcy trustee to dismiss pursuant to settlement agreement |
|
Sheskey v. DER & DETF |
|
5/31/2000 |
procedure, dismissal, complainant lacks standing to oppose request by bankruptcy trustee to dismiss pursuant to settlement agreement |
|
Balele v. DER & DMRS |
98-0145-PC-ER |
7/19/2000 |
ER, motion for sanctions, authority to enforce, authority to reopen case after closure |
|
Cruz v. DER |
00-0083-PC |
7/19/2000 |
reallocation, issue for hearing, release from stipulation, late request to change alternative classification |
|
Huff v. UW (La Crosse) |
95-0113-PC-ER |
7/27/2000 |
discovery, failure to respond to interrogatories and request to produce, failure to appear at oral deposition, egregious violation, dismissal of appeal |
|
Lang v. SPD |
98-0197-PC-ER |
8/23/2000 |
ER: 1) MSJ, FEA retal claim, was reasonable inference that C disagreed with mgt's alleged characterization of someone else as "racist"; 2) discovery, adequacy of answers, order to compel |
|
Chou v. DNR |
00-0019-PC-ER |
8/28/2000 |
discovery, motion to compel, performance of another employee discoverable topic where C says that real performance problems by that other employee were cause of office problems |
|
Guthrie v. UW (Whitewater) |
97-0164-PC-ER |
8/28/2000 |
ER, hire: 1) timeliness, waiver of timeliness objection, continuing violation, reasonably prudent standard; 2) "to print or circulate" prohibition; 3) evidence, direct evidence of discrimination, evidence "side show" |
|
Harrison v. DNR |
99-0112-PC |
8/28/2000 |
appeal, non-selection, merits, illegal act when respondent hired female due to her sex, rather than C |
|
Javenkoski v. DOT |
99-0101, 00-0010, 00-0013-PC-ER |
8/28/2000 |
ER, timeliness, mootness, FMLA, sex harassment, FMLA notice of law requirement |
|
Jensen v. DPI |
99-0070-PC |
8/28/2000 |
appeal, non-selection, numerous procedural problems, remedy |
|
Williams v. DOC & DER |
99-0092-PC |
8/28/2000 |
reclass, effective date, equitable estoppel argued (that C was led to believe that reclass request was pending) |
|
Kovacik v. DHFS |
97-0076-PC-ER
|
9/7/2000 |
discovery, motion to compel: 1)attorney-client privilege, attorney work product; 2) C's personnel file, including info that post-dated hire at issue [see later motion to reconsider] |
|
Ostrowski v. DNR |
99-0111-PC |
9/20/2000 |
appeal, non-selection, Park Manager, irregularities in scoring, lack of benchmarks, effect of earlier case finding that decision not to select a 3rd candidate constituted sex discrimination |
|
Bernecker v. DNR & DER |
00-0128-PC |
10/4/2000 |
appeal, filing fee, timeliness of fee, C's claim that no one in Commission was available to receive fee [see ruling on petition for rehearing, 11/21/2000] |
|
Brooks v. DOC |
00-0142-PC |
10/4/2000 |
appeal, jurisdiction, rate of pay, back pay under bargaining agreement |
|
Weber v. DOCom & DER |
98-0157-PC |
10/4/2000 |
appeal, reclass, claim preclusion or issue preclusion arising from litigation of earlier reclass denial, analogous to MSJ but disputed material facts |
|
Cothrine v. DPI |
00-0092-PC-ER |
10/9/2000 |
ER, timeliness, race, unfavorable employment references within 300 day period |
|
Ganther v. DOR |
97-0152-PC-ER |
10/20/2000 |
procedure: 1)request to postpone hearing, use of conference call to decide motion is approved; 2) request for substitution of hrg examiner based on mere dissatisfaction of examiner's previous ruling |
|
Person v. DOCom |
00-0083-PC-ER |
11/15/2000 |
ER, mootness, failure to reclassify, subsequent reallocation to desired level, still employed by agency |
|
Reed v. DOC |
00-0098-PC-ER |
11/15/2000 |
WB; 1) standing, one employee lacks standing to complain about discipline of co-worker; 2) failure to state a claim, policy relating to escorting guests in office and failure of co-workers to give flowers to C are not "disciplinary actions" |
|
Wagener v. DOC |
00-0161-PC |
11/15/2000 |
appeal, jurisdiction, parity adjustment |
|
Bernecker v. DNR & DER |
00-0128-PC |
11/21/2000 |
appeal, filing fee, fee rec'd 1 day late, was returned per request, then resubmitted unconditional, "processing" of appeal includes finding that 1st fee was untimely, rehearing denied |
|
Aylesworth v. DOC |
00-0110-PC |
12/13/2000 |
appeal, merits, non-selection, top-ranked after interview but less than positive references |
|
DuBois v. DOC & DER |
00-0151-PC |
12/13/2000 |
reall/reclass: 1) jurisdiction, decisions to place A's position at one pay point rather than another; 2) timeliness, notification of decision but not appeal procedure/option |
|
Newbold v. SPD |
96-0053-PC-ER & 96-0095-PC-ER |
12/13/2000 |
procedure, PC 5.03(9), request for free copy of transcript of closed case to pursue claim in another forum |
|
Carratt v. DOC |
98-0063-PC,98-0143-PC-ER |
1/19/2001 |
merits, non-selection: 1) appeal, highest cumulative score; 2) ER, A/C |
|
Emmerich v. DER |
00-0165-PC |
1/19/2001 |
appeal (reallocation), timeliness, notice sufficient to start the 30 day period, equitable estoppel, requirement that A act with due diligence |
|
Klett v. DNR |
00-0141-PC |
1/19/2001 |
procedure, postponement of hearing, PC 5.02, misapprehension of hearing date, no good cause |
|
Olmanson v. DHFS |
97-0106-PC, 97-0183-PC-ER |
1/19/2001 |
merits: 1) ER, conditions of employment, adverse action analysis of particular actions; a) marital status, policy that ees be discreet when they conduct extramarital affair does not violate public policy or FEA; b) sex; 2) appeal, non-select,inferior qual |
|
Balele v. DOA, DER & DMRS |
00-0077-PC-ER |
1/25/2001 |
issue for hearing, standing, no standing to pursue non-selection when C was not certified (due to misrepresentation of level of experience) |
|
Balele v. DOA, DER & DMRS |
00-0104-PC-ER |
2/8/2001 |
procedure, request for substitution of hearing examiners |
|
Miller v. DPI |
00-0011-PC |
2/8/2001 |
appeal, merits, non-selection, past performance |
|
Warren v. DHFS |
98-0146-PC, 98-0164-PC-ER |
2/9/2001 |
appeal/ER, merits, discipline, just cause analysis, threat of violence, reprimand equal to 3 day suspension for future discipline, suspension |
|
Otis v. DMRS |
00-0176-PC |
2/23/2001 |
appeal, issue for hearing, assessment of applicants |
|
Young v. DOT |
00-0025-PC-ER |
2/23/2001 |
procedure, lack of prosecution, failure to appear at a pre-hearing conference, no prejudice |
|
Sime v. DOA |
00-0108-PC-ER |
2/26/2001 |
FEA, mootness/failure to state claim, disability, non-selection, position never filled (hiring process frozen) |
|
Balele v. DOA, DER & DMRS |
00-0104-PC-ER, 00-0077-PC-ER |
3/21/2001 |
procedure, stay of hearing until C pays fees for filing frivolous WB claim |
|
Drigot v. DOT & DER |
00-0099-PC |
3/21/2001 |
reclass, Engineering Technician Transportation 3 to 4 |
|
Ferguson v. DOCom |
00-0143-PC-ER |
3/21/2001 |
ER, timeliness, knowledge of personnel action rather than written notice, capacity to get letter from post office |
|
Hemstead v. DER |
00-0155-PC |
3/21/2001 |
appeal, timeliness of appeal from reallocation decision is based on notice, written notice to C's supervisor that sup shared with C was adequate notice, unaware of right to appeal |
|
Smerz v. UW |
00-0095-PC |
3/21/2001 |
appeal, merits, non-selection, C not selected even though ranked 3rd and #1 and #2 declined |
|
Houff v. DHFS |
00-0035-PC-ER |
3/22/2001 |
ER, merits, sex (pregnancy), disability, probationary termination, 230.36 benefits |
|
Jones & Hunter v. DOT |
01-0001-PC & 01-0002-PC |
4/4/2001 |
4th step grievances, timeliness, jurisdiction over (nature of underlying personnel action) |
|
McCreedy v. DOC |
00-0038-PC |
4/4/2001 |
appeal, discipline, just cause, suspension, where no discipline for previous similar conduct and underlying policy was not important to work of institution |
|
Hoffman v. DNR & DER |
00-0133-PC |
5/17/2001 |
reallocation, Wildlife Technician and Advanced |
|
Balele v. DHFS, DER & DMRS |
00-0133-PC-ER |
5/24/2001 |
procedures, order to show cause, sanctions for bad faith prosecution |
|
Johnson v. DOC & DETF |
99-0098-PC-ER |
5/24/2001 |
ER, 1) jurisdiction, allegation that respondent failed to comply with 230.36 is not proper subject of FEA claim; 2) MSJ, C given opportunity to dispute information in respondent's reply brief |
|
Chiodo v. UW (Stout) |
93-0124-PC-ER |
5/25/2001 |
procedure, mootness, (Watkins analysis), attorney fees |
|
Hanson v. DOT |
00-027-PC-ER & 00-0103-PC-ER |
5/30/2001 |
ER: 1) MSJ; 2) discovery, late response to request for admissions, withdrawal of admission |
|
Oriedo v. DOC |
00-0001-PC-ER |
5/31/2001 |
ER, 1) merits, race, color, NO, FEA retal, hire, disparate impact; 2) procedure, recusal request |
|
Lane v. DOC |
95-0070-PC-ER & 95-0096-PC |
6/7/2001 |
merits:1) ER, WB, disability, accommodation, what constitutes WB disclosure; 2) demotion, just cause analysis, misuse of phone |
|
Bowman-Farrell v. CESA #8 |
01-0053-PC-ER |
6/13/2001 |
ER, jurisdiction, agency of the state |
|
Kuck v. CESA #8 |
01-0042-PC-ER |
6/13/2001 |
ER, jurisdiction, agency of the state |
|
O'Meara v. DOT |
01-0014-PC |
6/13/2001 |
appeal, jurisdiction, 4th step grievance, performance evaluation |
|
Otis v. DMRS |
00-0176-PC |
6/13/2001 |
appeal, MSJ, examination, entry professional program |
|
Harwell v. DPI |
98-0210-PC-ER, etc. |
6/28/2001 |
procedure, motion to compel discovery, discovery deadline |
|
Zeiler v.DOC |
01-0002-PC-ER |
6/28/2001 |
ER, protective order, non-selection, scope of protective order |